appgaf.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the appgaf.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host appgaf.org.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Memset Ltd .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

site map | contact us home about us faq's news reports archive links latest information (05/01/16) a summary of 'cochrane collaboration systematic review of water fluoridation 2015' has been posted in reports . read more . (16/04/14) a critique of 'one in a million: the facts' has been posted in reports . read more . (16/04/14) 'fluoridation: popularity' has been posted in the archive . read more . (18/04/10) new fluoridation scheme for southampton (18/04/10) the reports and archive sections have been updated with further documents and links (11/07/09) a critique of prof. newton's report to south central sha has been posted in reports . read more . (28/09/08) a critique of the south central strategic health authority consultation paper on water fluoridation in southampton, has been posted in reports . read more . (07/09/08) a response to the chief dental officer's 'dear colleague' letter of guidance for new schemes, endorsed by scientists from the york review, has been posted in reports . read more . (23/06/08) isle of man has announced on 12th june that it will not be fluoridating its water supply read more . (29/04/08) response to council on bioethics report (public health: ethical issues - november 2007) read more . (09/02/08) secretary of state calls for more fluoridation. read more . (07/12/06) confused about the issues surrounding water fluoridation? check our faq's section for the answers (07/12/06) if you are a group or organisation related to fluoridation and want to be added to our links on this site, please contact us (16/08/07) after a few technical problems this week, we're now back online. (07/12/06) the official website is online. visit us at appgaf.org.uk . -- t his is the homepage of the . -- please feel free to look around the reports and archive sections, or if you are looking for questions regarding the fluoridation of water, the faq section is there to help any queries you may have. the parliamentary registration of the appgaf ceased when the 2010 general election was called. steps are in being taken to establish a new group as soon as possible. details will be available on the website in due course. we cannot therefore respond to general enquiries for the former appgaf at the present time. this website was established when its membership included members of parliament. as parliament has been dissolved pending a general election there are no members of parliament until after the election on 6th may, 2010. visit us at www.appgaf.org.uk for more news and report updates. -- new fluoridation scheme for southampton? a consultation process was started on 8th september 2008 for a possible new fluoridation scheme in the southampton area. this will run until 19th december. there have been protests locally about the biased account of the evidence given out by south central strategic health authority , with whom the final decision will rest, and changes were made to the literature as a result. but the sha's current consultation paper remains a flawed and unscientific document. an examination of its many major errors has been posted in the reports section. about the group t he all-party group is the focus within westminster for opposition to the policy of water fluoridation. mp 's and peers meet regularly to discuss developments, and to organise meetings with ministers and other parties. it was a campaign of parliamentary questioning that led to the setting up of the major scientific review of the evidence world-wide in 2000 (the 'york review'), which first exposed the weakness of the case for fluoridating public water supplies. this, with the overriding ethical objection to medicating populations who have not given their individual consent, is what underpins the group's objection to fluoridation. many of the group's position papers and responses to aspects of fluoridation can be found on this website. -- about this website t his website offers well-informed comment on some current issues. we do not aim to duplicate what other websites already cover, for example by providing all the latest news on the fluoridation scene. we believe in arguing the case forcefully, but without overstating it. where we give one side of the picture, this is to draw attention to important areas which 'official' presentations leave out. readers should be aware of the deep commitment to fluoridation, dating back to long before the state of the evidence was known, by dentists and doctors, by public health bodies and by government, who between them issue most of the information on the subject. most professions hold some beliefs which acquire the status of sacred cows. in the authoritarian culture of the medical professions it is especially hard to challenge the received wisdom of fluoridation. this website does that, in a variety of ways. readers interested in parliamentary activity over fluoridation should go to www.parliament.uk what is fluoridation? w ater fluoridation is a complex issue, differing from other medical interventions in a number of ways . it is given indiscriminately to populations , many of whom cannot benefit from it, without the normal procedures of informed consent , and without the normal medicinal licensing procedures , by an uncontrolled dose for a lifetime via water supplies which feed into the environment ; it also raises disputed questions of law relating to medicines and human rights . in addition it requires technical equipment which is not without problems and expense. the gap between the claimed therapeutic dose and the toxic dose of fluoride is unusually narrow . fluoridation is only one of a number of methods of combating dental caries. this means that in addition to the usual scientific questions of efficacy and safety, there are other criteria by which society may decide whether or not to fluoridate , as examples from other countries that have rejected fluoridation demonstrate. the questions that must be addressed in a free and responsible society are therefore environmental ethical legal scientific technical cost-effectiveness related at present only the scientific question is being publicly addressed, in the wake of the york review and the mrc's report . all these questions, however, need to be satisfactorily answered before fluoridation schemes are promoted in a society which respects individual freedoms, the environment, the law, value for money, and good scientific evidence. meanwhile 5 million people are receiving fluoride through their water supply, which is probably a greater number than receive any medical drug [ compendium of health statistics for 2000, 14th edition]. continue... copyright © 2006-2017 | website by satur9 appgaf.org.uk | contact us | |

URL analysis for appgaf.org.uk

http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../archive/archive_popularity/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/reports_cochrane_collaboration_review_2015/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../links/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../news/news_southamp_mar10/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/about/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../archive/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/reports_sha_may09/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../news/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/reports_mrc_critique/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/reports_sha_sep08/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../reports/reports_cod_aug08/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../sitemap/
http://www.appgaf.org.uk/../faqs/
parliament.uk
satur9.co.uk
york.ac.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "appgaf.org.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 87 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 19:01:00 28-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS appgaf.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME appgaf.org.uk

NSERVER

  NS3.MEMSET.COM 31.222.188.99

  NS2.MEMSET.COM 78.31.107.87

  NS1.MEMSET.COM 89.200.136.74

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .